Long term, I believe ours should be dropped - I don't think it provides anything in any way better than libuuid, and therefore uuidm. It's in at the moment because our main code-base depends upon it, and changing it all over would be a reasonably large effort. It's one of the reasons we're putting it under the xcp/ subdirectory, so as not to conflict with anything existing and so that we don't give the impression that it we think it's ready as a library for consumption by others. Our main goal is to be able to get the XCP toolstack in, and this is a stepping stone on that path.
Jon On 9 Dec 2011, at 08:22, Stéphane Glondu wrote: > On 12/09/2011 08:42 AM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> There already are ocaml bindings for libuuid1: >> [...] >> Package: libuuidm-ocaml-dev > > These are not bindings. > >> Not knowing your source does your uuid do something different, something >> more? Could they be merged? > > Same question here. > > > Cheers, > > -- > Stéphane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ocaml-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/95d8783c-909d-4c8c-b497-0e465cca6...@cam.ac.uk
