Le 31/01/2012 12:44, Hendrik Tews a écrit : > What is the status dynlink.cmxa on armel?
It doesn't exist. There has been a discussion in [1] about that. Retrospectively, maybe I would advocate a dummy implementation of dynlink.cmxa everywhere... something like raising an exception, but definitely not a segfaulting one, as it was the case before. [1] http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=5049 > Camlp4 is a quite large library and the dynamic loading is just a > minor point IMHO. One can think of many Camlp4 applications that > do not need dynamic loading. If there is an architecture that has > native compilation but no dynlink.cmxa, then there should be > native camlp4 library on this architecture that does not depend > on dynamic loading. This is what I meant by "bug" :-) Cheers, -- Stéphane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ocaml-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f27e115.9040...@debian.org
