On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 10:51:01AM +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote: > Hi, > > Le 17/07/2024 à 21:56, Adrian Bunk a écrit : > > > Other than that, I'm happy with the current state and we could go ahead. > > > So > > > if you can get those bindings disabled, then I think we can go ahead. > > > > I tried looking at that, but this "ideally" is in level 15 of the ocaml > > transition. > > > > The bindings are already enabled only on some architectures, uploads to > > disable them everywhere are trivial while it's a pain to test any changes > > without the first 14 levels of the transition. > > I've made a repository with all packages compiled with OCaml 5.2.0: > > http://ocaml.debian.net/transitions/ocaml-5.2.0/ > > You can use it to test your changes. >...
I did a built test of the 5 versions, with the expected results: FTBFS with OCaml error: - llvm-toolchain-14 - llvm-toolchain-15 - llvm-toolchain-16 Builds: - llvm-toolchain-17 - llvm-toolchain-18 Now comes the funny part: In the strict release team transition sense, the LLVM packages are not part of the transition. Each of them needs an RC bug for libllvm-*-ocaml-dev not having any OCaml dependency that would ensure a matchint OCaml is installed, likely related to [1]. > Cheers, cu Adrian [1] https://sources.debian.org/src/llvm-toolchain-17/1%3A17.0.6-12/debian/rules/#L684-L687
