Your message dated Mon, 21 Mar 2005 10:58:39 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300688: openoffice.org: force users to install
openoffice.org-l10n-en, on what basis?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Mar 2005 07:15:53 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 20 23:15:52 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from attique.org (mx.attique.org) [81.56.103.59]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DDH8i-0004sd-00; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 23:15:52 -0800
Received: from eos.attique.in ([192.168.1.9])
by mx.attique.org with esmtp (Exim 4.44)
id 1DDH8C-0005Sk-VP
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 08:15:20 +0100
Received: from moa by eos.attique.in with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1DDH8C-0001oF-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 08:15:20 +0100
From: Mathieu Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: openoffice.org: force users to install openoffice.org-l10n-en, on
what basis?
X-Debbugs-CC: Mathieu Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-GPG-Keyserver: http://pgp.mit.edu
X-GPG-Keynumber: 2DA199B9 2002-04-09
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 08:15:20 +0100
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 1.1.3-7
Severity: normal
At the latest upgrade, in turned out that someone had the wonderful
idea to make openoffice.org dependant on openoffice.org-l10n-en.
On what basis? On what basis people that are not using en localization
should be forced to install these extra 4MB?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686-smp
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Versions of packages openoffice.org depends on:
ii dictionaries-common [openoffi 0.24.10 Common utilities for spelling dict
ii openoffice.org-bin 1.1.3-7 OpenOffice.org office suite binary
ii openoffice.org-debian-files 1.1.3-5+1 Debian specific parts of OpenOffic
ii openoffice.org-l10n-en [openo 1.1.3-7 English (US) language package for
ii openoffice.org-l10n-fr [openo 1.1.3-7 French language package for OpenOf
ii ttf-opensymbol 1.1.3-7 The OpenSymbol TrueType font
-- no debconf information
--
Mathieu Roy
+
| Thalie : <http://yeupou.coleumes.org/>
| Clio : <http://clio.coleumes.org/>
| Uranie : <http://alberich.coleumes.org/>
| Euterpe : <http://kromaniaks.coleumes.org/>
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 300688-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Mar 2005 09:59:30 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 21 01:59:29 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from public.id2-vpn.continvity.gns.novell.com
(emea3-mh.id2.novell.com) [195.33.99.129]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DDJh3-00012y-00; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 01:59:29 -0800
Received: from g20.suse.de
(L4-client1.id2.novell.com [149.44.117.249])
by emea3-mh.id2.novell.com; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 09:58:55 +0000
From: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: The Debian Project
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#300688: openoffice.org: force users to install
openoffice.org-l10n-en, on what basis?
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 10:58:39 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Hi,
Am Montag, 21. M=E4rz 2005 08:15 schrieb Mathieu Roy:
> At the latest upgrade, in turned out that someone had the wonderful
> idea to make openoffice.org dependant on openoffice.org-l10n-en.
This is a bogus assumption. plainly wrong.
openoffice.org *always* depended on openoffice.org-l10n-en | <some other=20
langpack>.
And the 1.1.3 stuff of course conflicts with the old 1.1.2 stuff and needs =
the=20
new 1.1.3 stuff. That the tool you used for upgrade is not able to figure=20
that out does not make this a bug in the package...
> On what basis? On what basis people that are not using en localization
> should be forced to install these extra 4MB?
See above.
Closing the bug.
Regards,
Reme
=2D-=20
.''`. Ren=E9 Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
