Hi, Leonardo Boselli wrote: > > Date: Sat, 7 May 2005 20:47:11 +0200 > > From: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Leonardo Boselli wrote: > > > Subject: openoffice.org: Obsolete version even on experimental > > WTF? What do you want to say with that? 1.1.4 is the latest upstream > > version and is in experimental (although the langpacks are not > > installable at the moment) > > 2.0 is *not* released and 1.9.x is beta-quality stuff which in some > > aspects is broken. But we are working on debs of it... > "In some aspect" ... yes, but has more function than 1.1.4 and i have not > yet found any broken part that worked on 1.1.4 and not in 1.9.>=95. > On the other part i have a lot of files that 1.1.3 does not open correctly > and a few ones that not even 1.1.4 open yet. > I do not say that you must put 1.9 in stable, but putting on experimental, > possibly with a caveat would be ok.
Worked on. As I said in my last mail. The last one built successfully was 1.9.92. Something you would call "old", wouldn't you? > Otherwise create a new package, openoffice.org2 (or openoffice2.org ?) > keeping in experimental, but regularly updated, so those that want to have > it in their system, at their risk, can take advantage from a standard > upgrade path via apt. Guess what? This is worked on. You have no idea what work that is... > > Closing this bogus bug. > not sure is a real "bug" but absolutely not a bogus need ! No. But you reported a "normal" bug with a insulting subject... Regards, Rene -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
