Quoting Chris Halls ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 02:38:20PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > > /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice.bin: relocation error: > > /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libvcl641li.so: symbol _ZN3psp10PrinterGfxC1Ev, > > version LIBPSPRINT_1_0 not defined in file libpsp641li.so with link time > > reference > > I'm seeing something very similar in my builds of 643. Did you build the > .debs yourself on your system or download the .debs from our mirrors?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> dpkg -s openoffice.org Package: openoffice.org Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Section: contrib/editors Installed-Size: 31680 Maintainer: Debian OpenOffice Team <[email protected]> Version: 1.0.1-5.6rc1 I have the following in my /etc/apt/sources.list, from the time OO wasn't in sid (is it now? I cannot check while I write this) # OpenOffice # deb ftp://ftp.vpn-junkies.de/openoffice unstable main contrib deb ftp://ftp.freenet.de/pub/ftp.vpn-junkies.de/openoffice unstable main contrib So, yes I probably got the package from one mirror. I'm maybe outdated and should remove this entry from my sources.list file and just use sid packages (if they now exist, do they?). On the other hand, if official packages now exist, you probably gave them higher version numbers than experimental packages. (for quick answer today, please keep CC'ed my work address, thanks) Just a small thanks anyway the the great work on OO packaging. I'm aware of the work needed by packaging "small" and not widely used programs...so packaging a monster like OO is a work I cannot even imagine..:-) -- Christian Perrier Debian geneweb and lifelines packages maintainer
