Your message dated Fri, 31 Jan 2003 10:55:41 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#179169: unresolvable dependencies in openoffice
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Jan 2003 09:21:03 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 31 03:21:03 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (mail.epost.de) [193.28.100.165]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18eXM7-0004Ef-00; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 03:21:03 -0600
Received: from localhost.localdomain (80.135.233.243) by mail.epost.de
(6.7.015) (authenticated as [EMAIL PROTECTED])
id 3E26EA2B001C1195 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 10:21:01
+0100
Subject: unresolvable dependencies in openoffice
From: Walter Brodowsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.5
Date: 31 Jan 2003 10:21:07 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 1.0.2-1
openoffice.org says it depends on libgcc1 (>= 1:3.2.1-1) and libstdc++5
(>= 1:3.2.1-1). However, those versions are only available in the
unstable tree.
apt naturally tells us this:
<snip>
Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
that package should be filed.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:
Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
openoffice.org-bin: Depends: libgcc1 (>= 1:3.2.1-1) but 1:3.2.1-0pre3
is to be installed
Depends: libstdc++5 (>= 1:3.2.1-1) but
1:3.2.1-0pre3 is to be installed
E: Sorry, broken packages
RESULT=100
<snap>
Cheers,
.walt
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 179169-close) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Jan 2003 09:58:44 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 31 03:58:44 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ping-ef-gw.ping.de (noefs.ping.de) [62.72.90.14] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18eXwZ-0006JN-00; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 03:58:43 -0600
Received: from [10.11.11.81] (helo=stan.ping.de)
by noefs.ping.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 18eXwN-0004zv-00; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 10:58:31 +0100
Received: by stan.ping.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 9C74B77753; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 10:55:41 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 10:55:41 +0100
From: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Walter Brodowsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#179169: unresolvable dependencies in openoffice
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux
X-GnuPG-Key: $ finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-16.5 required=5.0
tests=IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
SPAM_PHRASE_02_03,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
--xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
Walter Brodowsky wrote:
> Package: openoffice.org
> Version: 1.0.2-1
>=20
>=20
> openoffice.org says it depends on libgcc1 (>=3D 1:3.2.1-1) and libstdc++5
> (>=3D 1:3.2.1-1). However, those versions are only available in the
> unstable tree.=20
Sure. The packages are compiled for unstable on unstable.=20
> apt naturally tells us this:
> =20
> <snip>
>=20
> Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
> the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
> that package should be filed.
> The following information may help to resolve the situation:
>=20
> Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
> openoffice.org-bin: Depends: libgcc1 (>=3D 1:3.2.1-1) but 1:3.2.1-0pre3
> is to be installed
> Depends: libstdc++5 (>=3D 1:3.2.1-1) but
> 1:3.2.1-0pre3 is to be installed
> E: Sorry, broken packages
I suppose you are using testing or woody and have our unstable
repository in your sources.list?
Use the backported packages for woody then
-> http://www.linux-debian.de/openoffice shows you mirrors you can use
and the appropriate lines for your sources.list.
Closing this bug...
Regards,
Rene
--=20
.''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
--xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+Okgd+FmQsCSK63MRAqsnAJ98x9QPg4K73JdL+U1kc7Grk3MPJACeIOor
YsyYZ1p797xiaQhwXuJZExg=
=sVh5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V--
