Your message dated Tue, 25 Oct 2005 09:03:25 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing bugs fixed in 2.0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Jun 2004 15:51:38 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 01 08:51:38 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from korppi.suomicommunications.com [217.119.36.25]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BVBY9-0000vc-00; Tue, 01 Jun 2004 08:51:38 -0700
Received: from route.intranet (gw-1.hel010.suomicommunications.com
[217.119.37.203])
by korppi.suomicommunications.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/SC) with ESMTP id
i51Fpauq012326;
Tue, 1 Jun 2004 18:51:37 +0300
Received: from omena.intranet ([172.16.1.14] ident=q-funk)
by route.intranet with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1BVBYw-000687-00; Tue, 01 Jun 2004 18:52:26 +0300
Received: by omena.intranet (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 1 Jun 2004
18:51:27 +0300
From: "Martin-Ãric Racine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: openoffice.org-bin: dependencies affecting tasksel and d-i should be
modified to propose -bin
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.60
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2004 18:51:26 +0300
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: openoffice.org-bin
Version: 1.1.1-3
Severity: important
As discussed on IRC, changing dependencies in the build process would prevent
the _all packages from being uploaded
to architectures not supported by OpenOffice (sorry for the straight cut&paste;
I could not think how to summarize
the issue otherwise):
12:58 < Q-FUNK> can anyone think of a solution for the Architecture line of a
meta-package that installs various
localisation files, so that the package can only be installed
on the 4 architectures supported by
openoffice?12:59 < Q-FUNK> Architecture: i386 powerpc sparc s390
13:00 < Q-FUNK> that came to mind, but would require actually building the
package separately for each architecture,
which is not what I want. I just want that package not to be
installable on non-supported architectures.
13:01 < martink> well, openoffice.org (the package) has "Architecture: all"
13:02 < martink> and it's obviously useless on anything but i386, powerpc,
sparc, s390
13:03 < Q-FUNK> wouldn't it make sense to make a policy change to re-introduct
the [arch] tag for control?
13:14 < martink> <i-am-not-a-d-d> Don't know </i-am-not-a-d-d> ;-)
13:15 < LarstiQ> the way tasksel deals with it is depending on
openoffice.org-bin instead
13:26 < Q-FUNK> that's how my funkyware-dekstop package is made (depends upon
-bin), but funkyware-oo-locales just
depends upon the myspell dictionaries and locales themselves.
13:28 < martink> but the locales depend on openoffice.org which depends on
openoffice.org-bin. Is that not enough of
a hint for apt
13:35 < Q-FUNK> no. it still preselects the packages, but complains that -bin
is not available.
13:35 < Q-FUNK> there's no way to prevent someone from accidentally selecting
the funkyware-oo-locales package on an
arch not supported by OOo
13:36 < Q-FUNK> because the -all packages for OOo are still available in
non-supported arches' repositories.
17:39 < haggai> Q-FUNK: the -all packages never leave unstable for those arches
AFAIK
17:40 < _rene_> hmm? context?
17:41 < haggai> 11:58 < Q-FUNK> that came to mind, but would require actually
building the package separately
17:41 < haggai> for each architecture, which is not what I
want. I just want that package not
17:41 < haggai> to be installable on non-supported
architectures.
17:41 < haggai> 12:34 < Q-FUNK> because the -all packages for OOo are still
available in non-supported arches'
17:41 < haggai> repositories.
17:42 < _rene_> for what?
17:42 < haggai> ah, you mean you missed the conversation? I'll /msg it to you
17:42 < _rene_> btw, what you say is not true. openoffice.org _is_ in the
packages files for !i386,sparc,powerpc,s390
17:42 < haggai> in testing?
17:42 < _rene_> excuse me if I got it wrong
17:42 < _rene_> Hmm
17:42 < _rene_> good question :)
17:42 < _rene_> I think yes
17:43 * haggai thought not
17:43 < _rene_> let's look
17:44 < _rene_> http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/testing_probs.html
17:44 < _rene_> and search for openoffice.org
17:45 < haggai> oh yuk
17:45 < haggai> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ grep "Package: openoffice.org$"
/home/org/ftp.root/debian/dists/*/main/binary-arm/Packages
17:45 < haggai>
/home/org/ftp.root/debian/dists/sarge/main/binary-arm/Packages:Package:
openoffice.org
17:45 < haggai>
/home/org/ftp.root/debian/dists/sid/main/binary-arm/Packages:Package:
openoffice.org
17:46 < _rene_> jep...
17:47 < _rene_> a way to make it lesser confusing would be a s/-bin// and make
openoffice.org -common or so
17:47 < _rene_> maybe we could do that post-sarge
17:56 < haggai> hmm, I guess so
18:01 < _rene_> because testing ignores all packages' installability on !i386
18:01 < _rene_> s/all/_all/
18:03 < Q-FUNK> hopefully pre-sarge
18:03 < _rene_> Q-FUNK: you really don't want us to chenage the structure in
this way so short before a release?
18:03 < _rene_> Q-FUNK: no way
18:03 < _rene_> s/n't//
18:04 < LarstiQ> well
18:04 < _rene_> although this change really makes sense...
18:04 < LarstiQ> indeed
18:04 < LarstiQ> openoffice wasn't in woody, no?
18:05 < _rene_> right
18:08 < LarstiQ> well then, if the change can be debugged pre-sarge :)
18:12 < haggai> sorry folks, it's too late to change it
18:13 < haggai> we'll mess up stuff like tasksel
18:16 * LarstiQ nods
18:16 * LarstiQ has no idea about timeframes and such
18:16 < LarstiQ> haggai: but talking about it with tasksel and other people
involved won't hurt?
18:18 < _rene_> LarstiQ: roughly speaking: as soon as d-i is ready there'll be
the freeze
18:18 < _rene_> and d-i now has rc's...
18:18 < LarstiQ> knowing d-i, that will coincide with hell freezing over
18:19 < haggai> LarstiQ: they have been hacking on it and doing release testing
all week here at debconf
18:19 < LarstiQ> aaaah, debconf
18:19 < haggai> LarstiQ: it won't be long now
18:19 < LarstiQ> right, that will help :)
18:19 < LarstiQ> it did last year *cough*
18:20 < LarstiQ> haggai: see my point?
18:20 < Q-FUNK> but it would be silly to leave such an obvious bug open.
otherwise, we'll have to wait 2 years to
get it done...
18:20 < LarstiQ> haggai: I hope it happens soon, yes, but it's been like that
for even longer
18:20 < _rene_> Q-FUNK: it would be silly to do this major change now
18:20 < LarstiQ> Q-FUNK: have to balance it with breaking things at this stage
tho
18:21 < _rene_> Q-FUNK: and possibly introduce new bugs
18:21 < _rene_> Q-FUNK: package relationships, upgrade stuff, tasks, ...
18:21 < Q-FUNK> IMHO, the change should still be made and uploaded to unstable
as 1.1.1-4. If it makes it on time,
if not, people using testing will still eventually see it.
18:22 < Q-FUNK> _rene_: well right now there's nothing to upgrade from, as far
as OOo is concerned. there's still
time. I realize it's a lot of work rather close to the freeze,
but it would really help if it could
be done now.
18:23 < Q-FUNK> and I really am NOT confident with d-i being really completed
and 100% bug-free on all 11
architectures on time.
18:24 < Q-FUNK> the d-i is getting better all the time, but it's still not
quite there on all architectures.
18:25 < Q-FUNK> well, anyhow, the decision is up to you guys, of course. :)
18:26 < _rene_> you could write wishlist bug with which we we'll deal when the
time comes ;)
18:27 < _rene_> errors in this sentence are a gift ;)
18:33 < Q-FUNK> hm??
18:34 < _rene_> we we'll, missing a etc :)
18:35 < LarstiQ> if all parties involved agree to go ahead, it can be done?
18:36 < LarstiQ> just don't break this under people's noses
18:36 < LarstiQ> I don't think ooo will be dropped from sarge, so you'll be
lynched instead :)
18:37 * _rene_ ponders writing a big plate "it's LarstiQ's fault" ;)
18:37 < LarstiQ> that, of course, would also do
18:37 < _rene_> which will protect us ;-)
18:38 < LarstiQ> and they can't strip me from anything much
18:42 < haggai> I'm sorry, I really think this is far too late
18:42 < LarstiQ> haggai: even with the big plate that has my name on it?
18:42 < haggai> we can't afford to have all the delays and time needed to do
this
18:42 < _rene_> LarstiQ: yes
18:42 < _rene_> LarstiQ: it was a joke
18:43 < haggai> this should have been done at least a few months ago. Iagree
it is a problem and needs fixing, but
the fix has too many possible problems
18:43 < LarstiQ> bah, why does haggai have to be sensible
18:43 < haggai> heh :)
18:44 < haggai> 'cos I get all the flack when it breaks? :)
18:44 < LarstiQ> I'm still willing to accept a big plate ;)
18:44 < LarstiQ> _rene_: (yes, that's joking)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (101, 'testing'), (99, 'unstable')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.6-imac
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Versions of packages openoffice.org-bin depends on:
ii debconf 1.4.25 Debian configuration management sy
ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.16-5 Library of functions for 2D graphi
ii libaudio2 1.6c-4 The Network Audio System (NAS). (s
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-12 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libcurl2 7.11.2-1 Multi-protocol file transfer libra
ii libdb3++c102 3.2.9-19.1 Berkeley v3 Database Libraries for
ii libfontconfig1 2.2.2-2 generic font configuration library
ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii libgcc1 1:3.3.3-9 GCC support library
ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii libmyspell3 1:3.1-5 MySpell spellchecking library
ii libneon23 0.23.9.dfsg.2-1 An HTTP and WebDAV client library
ii libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System Session Management
ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.3-9 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii libstlport4.6 4.6.2-1 STLport C++ class library
ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 X Window System protocol client li
ii libxaw7 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1 X Athena widget set library
ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii libxt6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 X Toolkit Intrinsics
ii openoffice.org 1.1.1-3 high-quality office productivity s
ii xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System client libraries m
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.1.1-3 compression library - runtime
-- debconf information:
* openoffice.org-bin/prelink: true
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 252125-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Oct 2005 17:01:57 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 25 10:01:57 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pop.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net) [213.165.64.20]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EUSBQ-0002VP-00; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 10:01:57 -0700
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 25 Oct 2005 17:01:25 -0000
Received: from dslb-084-056-118-137.pools.arcor-ip.net (EHLO frodo)
[84.56.118.137]
by mail.gmx.net (mp026) with SMTP; 25 Oct 2005 19:01:25 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1545045
Received: by frodo (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 6E34F112DEC; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 09:03:25 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 09:03:25 +0200
From: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: closing bugs fixed in 2.0
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-PGP-Key: 248AEB73
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
Version: 2.0.0-1
Hi,
These bugs are fixed in 2.0.0-1 (or already by a previous version in
experimental) and have been tagged fixed-in-experimental manualy.
I am closing them now.
Regards,
Rene
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
