On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 06:01:31PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > Rene Engelhard wrote: > > Ariel Garcia wrote: > > > it came to my mind that perhaps it would be worth trying building OO "the > > > Debian way" but without the debian patches, as perhaps the problem lies > > > not on the linked libs but on some patch itself. > > > > Maybe yes. But most of those patches didn't change from 2.2.0 to 2.2.1. > > There were only some really minor changes needed to get them applied on > > 2.2.1... > > I didn't mention that in my last mail becausew the testbuild(s) were > stil running, but the culprit might be boost.
doh! > Suse ships 1.33 in 10.2 so they probably didn't see this and 2.2.0-x > also did get build with the old boost. In t he meanwhile, we're at 1.34 > and even ppc (who did work before) doesn't work anymore when rebuilt > (this time with boost 1.34). And boost actually *is* used in the > graphics/drawing stuff of OOo.... which libraries are we talking about? i do not see openoffice.org-draw depend on any dynamic one. > Building with internal boost work around the problem, with the downside > that the native HelpLinker does not build anymore with an STLport errot > which increases buildtime with many hours.... I'll try a build with > stlport4.6... > > Boost people: any idea what changed in boost to make this happen? surely a universe of things... nothing specific i could say quickly. cheers domenico -----[ Domenico Andreoli, aka cavok --[ http://www.dandreoli.com/gpgkey.asc ---[ 3A0F 2F80 F79C 678A 8936 4FEE 0677 9033 A20E BC50 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
