Hello René, first, thank you for your fast answer.
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 12:11:11PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > bpo is not in the scope of this BTS. In this case the BTS doesn't even > know there's a 2.2.1-1~bpo.1 anywhere. I just thought it was a good idea to inform you about this issue. > > If I start the report wizard from oobase i get an nearly empty page as > > described earlier in this bug and the following error messages. > Yes. Most probably because it was built with etchs gcj (of course) and > the newer gcj in sid fixes loads of stuff. I have no *gcj* or *gij* packages installed on my system. Can the compilation in an etch environment be a matter anyhow? > > ii sun-java5-bin 1.5.0-10-3 Sun Java(TM) > > Runtime Environment (JRE) 5.0 (architecture depende > > ii sun-java5-fonts 1.5.0-10-3 Lucida > > TrueType fonts (from the Sun JRE) > > ii sun-java5-jre 1.5.0-10-3 Sun Java(TM) > > Runtime Environment (JRE) 5.0 (architecture indepen > > ii sun-java5-plugin 1.5.0-10-3 The Java(TM) > > Plug-in, Java SE 5.0 > > Which arch, fwiw? OO.org/amd64 + Sun JDK is still a no-go afaik in an > case. i386 Do you think OpenOffice is running better with GCJ/GIJ than with sun-java5* ? Cheers, Martin
