On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> wrote:

> OK. Good that the boost transition planned is going to use 1.53.. :)


Though these CLucene headers might be picked up using 1.53 also and may
cause subtle problems (but not as dramatic as breaking the build).
I didn't dig too deeply what's changed from Boost 1.53 to 1.54 that caused
this,
but it's *not *the location where BOOST_NOEXCEPT is defined
(boost/config/suffix.hpp in both cases).

I've no idea either, that should proably better asked to the clucene
> "maintainer".
>

Submitted as #715474 "Contains boost headers that cause problems with
libboost1.54-dev"

Cheers, Roderich

Reply via email to