On 10/12/15 21:55, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 09:04:55PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: >>> Binary file libevoablo.so matches >> >> And this is the evolution ab thingy. Probably depending on gtk2 because >> of evolution (which also changed). I mean, it doesn't use gtk directly >> afaics: >> >> (sid)rene@frodo ..ta2/connectivity/source/drivers/evoab2 % grep -r gtk_ * >> 1 (sid)rene@frodo ..ta2/connectivity/source/drivers/evoab2 % > > libebook is (forgot to mention that in my last mail) dlopen()'ed anyway and > a build says this: > > pkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if > debian/libreoffice-evolution/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libevoablo.so was > not linked against libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 (it uses none of the library's > symbols) > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if > debian/libreoffice-evolution/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libevoablo.so was > not linked against libucbhelper.so (it uses none of the library's symbols) > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if > debian/libreoffice-evolution/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libevoablo.so was > not linked against libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 (it uses none of the library's > symbols) > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if > debian/libreoffice-evolution/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libevoablo.so was > not linked against libfreetype.so.6 (it uses none of the library's symbols) > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if > debian/libreoffice-evolution/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libevoablo.so was > not linked against libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 (it uses none of the library's > symbols) > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if > debian/libreoffice-evolution/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libevoablo.so was > not linked against libfontconfig.so.1 (it uses none of the library's symbols) > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if > debian/libreoffice-evolution/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libevoablo.so was > not linked against libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 (it uses none of the library's symbols) > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if > debian/libreoffice-evolution/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libevoablo.so was > not linked against libatk-1.0.so.0 (it uses none of the library's symbols) > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if > debian/libreoffice-evolution/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libevoablo.so was > not linked against libcairo.so.2 (it uses none of the library's symbols) > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if > debian/libreoffice-evolution/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libevoablo.so was > not linked against libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 (it uses none of the library's symbols) > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if > debian/libreoffice-evolution/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libevoablo.so was > not linked against libpango-1.0.so.0 (it uses none of the library's symbols) > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if > debian/libreoffice-evolution/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libevoablo.so was > not linked against libfilelo.so (it uses none of the library's symbols) > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if > debian/libreoffice-evolution/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libevoablo.so was > not linked against libgio-2.0.so.0 (it uses none of the library's symbols) > # dpkg-shlibdeps "in practice" always will look for this in > > so we probably don't need a gtk linkage at all there.
I have forwarded this part to https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96396 Cheers, Emilio
