debian-policy  

Messages by Date

• 2002/05/03 Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/05/03 Re: The Serious severity Grant Bowman
• 2002/05/03 [luca@debian.org: Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices"] Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis
• 2002/05/03 Re: The Serious severity Marcus Brinkmann
• 2002/05/03 Re: The Serious severity Grant Bowman
• 2002/05/03 Re: The Serious severity Marcus Brinkmann
• 2002/05/03 [OT] oh dear [was Re: The Serious severity] Richard Smedley
• 2002/05/03 Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" Anthony Towns
• 2002/05/03 Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" Anthony Towns
• 2002/05/03 Re: The Serious severity Anthony Towns
• 2002/05/03 [no subject] officegirl
• 2002/05/03 Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" Anthony Towns
• 2002/05/03 Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" Anthony Towns
• 2002/05/03 Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" Wichert Akkerman
• 2002/05/03 Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" Grant Bowman
• 2002/05/02 Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/05/02 Re: The Serious severity Matt Zimmerman
• 2002/05/02 Re: The Serious severity Branden Robinson
• 2002/05/02 Re: The Serious severity Joey Hess
• 2002/05/02 Re: The Serious severity Branden Robinson
• 2002/05/02 Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" Wichert Akkerman
• 2002/05/02 Re: The Serious severity Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/05/02 Re: The Serious severity Branden Robinson
• 2002/05/02 Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/05/02 Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/05/02 Re: The Serious severity Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/05/02 Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/05/02 Re: The Serious severity Branden Robinson
• 2002/05/02 Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" Wichert Akkerman
• 2002/05/02 Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" Julian Gilbey
• 2002/05/02 Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" Wichert Akkerman
• 2002/05/02 Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" Julian Gilbey
• 2002/05/02 Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" Julian Gilbey
• 2002/05/02 Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/05/01 Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" Anthony Towns
• 2002/05/01 Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/05/01 [no subject] laurent mpeti kabila
• 2002/05/01 Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" Anthony Towns
• 2002/05/01 Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" Steve Kowalik
• 2002/05/01 Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices" Julian Gilbey
• 2002/03/31 Re: Bug#108416: Bug#139957: period at the end of short description? Richard Braakman
• 2002/03/31 Bug#108416: Bug#139957: period at the end of short description? Chris Waters
• 2002/03/31 Bug#108416: Bug#139957: period at the end of short description? Colin Walters
• 2002/03/31 Bug#140697: debian-policy: Typo in Appendix G (diversions) Daniel Jacobowitz
• 2002/03/31 Re: Bug#139957: period at the end of short description? Anthony Towns
• 2002/03/31 Bug#139957: period at the end of short description? Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/03/30 Bug#108416: Bug#139957: period at the end of short description? Chris Waters
• 2002/03/30 Re: Bug#139957: period at the end of short description? Colin Walters
• 2002/03/30 Re: Bug#108416: Bug#139957: period at the end of short description? Colin Walters
• 2002/03/30 Re: Bug#139957: period at the end of short description? Colin Walters
• 2002/03/29 www-data is a bad name for what it currently is used for... Matthew Whitworth
• 2002/03/29 Bug#108416: Bug#139957: period at the end of short description? Joey Hess
• 2002/03/29 Bug#139957: period at the end of short description? Anthony Towns
• 2002/03/29 Bug#139957: period at the end of short description? Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/03/29 Bug#139957: period at the end of short description? Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/03/29 Bug#139957: period at the end of short description? Chris Waters
• 2002/03/29 Processed: Re: Bug#139957: period at the end of short description? Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2002/03/29 Bug#108416: Bug#139957: period at the end of short description? Colin Walters
• 2002/03/28 Bug#139957: period at the end of short description? Branden Robinson
• 2002/03/28 Bug#139957: period at the end of short description? Anthony Towns
• 2002/03/28 Re: Bug#139957: period at the end of short description? Colin Walters
• 2002/03/28 Bug#139957: period at the end of short description? Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/03/27 Re: Bug#139957: period at the end of short description? Colin Walters
• 2002/03/27 Re: Bug#139957: period at the end of short description? Joey Hess
• 2002/03/27 Re: Bug#139957: period at the end of short description? Colin Walters
• 2002/03/27 Bug#139957: period at the end of short description? Branden Robinson
• 2002/03/27 Bug#139957: period at the end of short description? Colin Watson
• 2002/03/27 Bug#139957: period at the end of short description? Josip Rodin
• 2002/03/27 Bug#139957: period at the end of short description? Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/03/27 Re: Bug#139957: period at the end of short description? Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/03/26 Bug#139957: period at the end of short description? Joey Hess
• 2002/03/26 Bug#139957: period at the end of short description? Anthony Towns
• 2002/03/26 Bug#139957: period at the end of short description? Branden Robinson
• 2002/03/26 Bug#139969: debian-policy: dubious shell programming advice re: set -e [patch included] Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/03/26 Bug#139957: period at the end of short description? Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/03/26 Bug#139957: period at the end of short description? Josip Rodin
• 2002/03/26 Bug#139969: debian-policy: dubious shell programming advice re: set -e [patch included] era eriksson
• 2002/03/25 Bug#139957: period at the end of short description? Colin Walters
• 2002/03/25 Bug#139820: debian-policy: Overlong lines in .ps version era eriksson
• 2002/03/25 Bug#139820: debian-policy: Overlong lines in .ps version Ardo van Rangelrooij
• 2002/03/25 Bug#139832: debian-policy: typos in policy.sgml [patch included] era eriksson
• 2002/03/25 Bug#139820: debian-policy: Overlong lines in .ps version era eriksson
• 2002/03/22 Bug#139466: dh-make: Sample init.d's output should follow policy's suggestion Timshel Knoll
• 2002/03/22 Processed: Re: Bug#139437: base-files: /usr/share/common-licenses should contain the FDL Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2002/03/22 Re: Bug#139437: base-files: /usr/share/common-licenses should contain the FDL Santiago Vila
• 2002/03/20 Processed: now if only i could spell, too Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2002/03/20 Processed: retitle Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2002/03/19 Bug#139067: debian-policy: aspell-dictionary virtual package name proposed Domenico Andreoli
• 2002/03/19 Bug#139067: debian-policy: aspell-dictionary virtual package name proposed Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/03/19 Bug#139067: debian-policy: aspell-dictionary virtual package name proposed Domenico Andreoli
• 2002/03/19 Bug#137172: marked as done (debian-policy: FHS section requires updates) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2002/03/19 Bug#51412: marked as done (conflict in documents) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2002/03/19 Bug#137521: marked as done (debian-policy: error in doc-base file) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2002/03/19 Bug#51411: marked as done (build-essential does not include debhelper) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2002/03/19 Bug#132621: marked as done (debian-policy: /etc/init.d _must_ be conffiles (not should)) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2002/03/19 Bug#131781: marked as done ([ACCEPTED] Proposed virtual packages: audio-mixer and x-audio-mixer) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2002/03/19 Bug#126131: marked as done (debian-policy: Errors in section 9.1 footnote 3) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2002/03/19 Bug#123570: marked as done ([ACCEPTED] new virtual package foomatic-data) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2002/03/19 Bug#122996: marked as done ([ACCEPTED] dict-client virtual package name proposed) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2002/03/19 Bug#122931: marked as done (debian-policy: Spelling consistency "depend(e|a)ncies" in policy 2.3.8.1) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2002/03/19 Bug#110713: marked as done (java-compiler and java-virtual-machine missing from virtual-package-names-list.text.gz) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2002/03/19 Bug#121977: marked as done (bad link to the original version in the MIME policy and the menu policy) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2002/03/19 Bug#110705: marked as done (typo error in upgrading-checklist) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2002/03/19 Bug#110711: marked as done (Incorrect references to 'package-developer') Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2002/03/19 Bug#110446: marked as done (typo error in virtual-package-names-list.txt) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2002/03/19 debian-policy_3.5.6.1_i386.changes ACCEPTED Debian Installer
• 2002/03/18 subscribe Bdale Garbee
• 2002/03/16 Bug#138681: debian-policy: typo in section 12.8.5 Jamie Wilkinson
• 2002/03/15 Re: Using deb packages to release proprietary software Chris Lawrence
• 2002/03/15 Re: Bug#138409: [PROPOSAL] Add build environment data to <package>.changes files Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/03/15 Processed: This is a wishlist proposal for dpkg Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2002/03/15 Bug#138409: PROPOSAL] Add build environment data to <package>.changes files Randolph Chung
• 2002/03/15 Bug#138409: PROPOSAL] Add build environment data to <package>.changes files Junichi Uekawa
• 2002/03/15 Re: Using deb packages to release proprietary software Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2002/03/15 Bug#138409: PROPOSAL] Add build environment data to <package>.changes files Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/03/15 Re: Using deb packages to release proprietary software Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/03/15 Re: Using deb packages to release proprietary software Julian Gilbey
• 2002/03/15 Bug#138409: PROPOSAL] Add build environment data to <package>.changes files Julian Gilbey
• 2002/03/15 Bug#138409: PROPOSAL] Add build environment data to <package>.changes files Randolph Chung
• 2002/03/15 Using deb packages to release proprietary software Daniel Ruoso
• 2002/03/15 Bug#138409: PROPOSAL] Add build environment data to <package>.changes files Julian Gilbey
• 2002/03/14 Bug#138409: [PROPOSAL] Add build environment data to <package>.changes files Randolph Chung
• 2002/03/14 Re: Bug#137172: removing Dan Quinlan's addr from policy Julian Gilbey
• 2002/03/14 debian-policy 3.5.6.1 uploaded to INCOMING/DELAYED/2-day/ Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/03/14 Subscribe Aguimar Mendon�a Neto
• 2002/03/14 CVS srivasta: * Set the cotact information for the FHS contact, and add mention of the debian-policy
• 2002/03/14 Re: Bug#137172: removing Dan Quinlan's addr from policy Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/03/14 Re: Bug#137172: removing Dan Quinlan's addr from policy Daniel Dent
• 2002/03/14 Re: Bug#137172: removing Dan Quinlan's addr from policy Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/03/14 Bug#137172: removing Dan Quinlan's addr from policy Julian Gilbey
• 2002/03/14 Bug#137172: removing Dan Quinlan's addr from policy Anthony Towns
• 2002/03/14 Bug#137172: removing Dan Quinlan's addr from policy Julian Gilbey
• 2002/03/14 Bug#137172: removing Dan Quinlan's addr from policy Roland Mas
• 2002/03/14 Bug#137172: removing Dan Quinlan's addr from policy Marcus Brinkmann
• 2002/03/14 Bug#137172: removing Dan Quinlan's addr from policy Chris Waters
• 2002/03/13 Policy needed for naming backup files Thomas Hood
• 2002/03/12 Processed: Changing to a more stable submitter address Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2002/03/11 Processed: Forgot to Cc: control Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2002/03/10 Re: Bug#122038: use of /var/backups is apparently undocumented Santiago Vila
• 2002/03/09 Bug#137521: debian-policy: error in doc-base file Laurent Bonnaud
• 2002/03/09 Bug#96597: changing policy requirements for debian native packages to _MUST_ Wichert Akkerman
• 2002/03/07 Bug#137172: debian-policy: FHS section requires updates Josip Rodin
• 2002/03/07 Bug#137172: debian-policy: FHS section requires updates Daniel Quinlan
• 2002/03/07 Bug#137172: debian-policy: FHS section requires updates Josip Rodin
• 2002/03/07 Bug#137172: debian-policy: FHS section requires updates Steve Kowalik
• 2002/03/07 Bug#137172: debian-policy: FHS section requires updates Daniel Quinlan
• 2002/03/07 Bug#137172: debian-policy: FHS section requires updates Chris Waters
• 2002/03/06 Bug#137172: debian-policy: FHS section requires updates Daniel Quinlan
• 2002/03/06 Bug#127809: not a bug? Thomas Hood
• 2002/03/05 Bug#96597: changing policy requirements for debian native packages to _MUST_ Matt Zimmerman
• 2002/03/05 Bug#96597: changing policy requirements for debian native packages to _MUST_ Mark Brown
• 2002/03/04 Bug#96597: changing policy requirements for debian native packages to _MUST_ Andres Salomon
• 2002/03/04 Bug#96597: changing policy requirements for debian native packages to _MUST_ Chris Waters
• 2002/03/04 Bug#96597: changing policy requirements for debian native packages to _MUST_ Joey Hess
• 2002/03/04 Bug#96597: changing policy requirements for debian native packages to _MUST_ Andres Salomon
• 2002/03/04 Bug#96597: changing policy requirements for debian native packages to _MUST_ Chris Waters
• 2002/03/04 Re: * WARNING: Crypto software to be included into main Debian distribution Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2002/03/04 Re: * WARNING: Crypto software to be included into main Debian distribution Stephen Ryan
• 2002/03/04 Bug#96597: changing policy requirements for debian native packages to _MUST_ Julian Gilbey
• 2002/03/04 * WARNING: Crypto software to be included into main Debian distribution jose
• 2002/03/03 Bug#96597: changing policy requirements for debian native packages to _MUST_ Andres Salomon
• 2002/03/01 Bug#136318: 11.9: document handling of directories permission when upgrading Bill Allombert
• 2002/02/28 ���ã�⿡ �߰��ص� ��������Ʈ [�� ��] �����
• 2002/02/28 Welcome to Liers_dot_net_Liers_dot_org_auction_notification_list auction-request
• 2002/02/26 [����] ȭ��Ʈ���� �ູ�̺�Ʈ 10 ����100
• 2002/02/25 JPL Group JPL Group
• 2002/02/23 Hi ! 9996CWNU1-350sslK9065xHUB8-092l28 test0881i46
• 2002/02/23 Re: What is the "system" Anthony Towns
• 2002/02/22 Re: What is the "system" Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
• 2002/02/22 What is the "system" Georges Mariano
• 2002/02/22 Re: copyright file in .deb Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
• 2002/02/22 copyright file in .deb Bill Allombert
• 2002/02/21 Analyse your voice and check your compatibility with friends/celebs... Introducing StarMatch \(UK\)
• 2002/02/21 [�� ��] �ؿܱ������� �ѱ���ǰ ���ռ��θ� HanBay
• 2002/02/21 unsubscribe Piotr Uruski
• 2002/02/20 Bug#134977: debian-policy: section 7.4 'Virtual packages - Provides' doesn't say what it means? Britton Leo Kerin
• 2002/02/20 DM/TM,창업,영업정보를 알려드립니다.[광고] 오피스프라자
• 2002/02/18 [no subject] DR.MRS MIRIAM ABACHA
• 2002/02/18 [ȫ��]ȸ�����Խ� ���� �ؿ� ������� �帳�ϴ�. ���డ��
• 2002/02/18 Re: Bug#133306: apt-listchanges: Does not handle .pyc files correctly Donovan Baarda
• 2002/02/18 Re: Bug#133306: apt-listchanges: Does not handle .pyc files correctly Jim Penny
• 2002/02/18 Processed: 89867: retitle, severity and comment Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2002/02/18 Bug#89867: 89867: retitle, severity and comment Tollef Fog Heen
• 2002/02/15 Re: Policy for init.d scripts is not LSB compilant Grant Bowman
• 2002/02/14 Please confirm your request to subscribe to HomesAtCodwellBanker Yahoo! Groups
• 2002/02/13 Bug#133808: proposal for a License: tag in packages Marco d'Itri
• 2002/02/13 Bug#133808: proposal for a License: tag in packages Robert Millan
• 2002/02/11 Re: Bug#132767: debsum support should be mandatory Jason Gunthorpe
• 2002/02/11 Bug#132621: debian-policy: /etc/init.d _must_ be conffiles (not should) Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/02/11 Re: Bug#132767: debsum support should be mandatory Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/02/11 Re: Bug#132621: debian-policy: /etc/init.d _must_ be conffiles (not should) Anthony DeRobertis
• 2002/02/11 Processed: reopen bug Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2002/02/10 Re: Bug#132767: debsum support should be mandatory Jason Gunthorpe
• 2002/02/09 Bug#133030: marked as done (debian-policy: debconf policy (specification) implies dpkg will run .config before preinst ALWAYS) Joey Hess
• 2002/02/09 Bug#133030: marked as done (debian-policy: debconf policy (specification) implies dpkg will run .config before preinst ALWAYS) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2002/02/09 Re: Bug#132767: debsum support should be mandatory Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/02/09 <����>��õ�εθ��� 50���� �̷�����
• 2002/02/09 Bug#133096: marked as done (policy is unclear about Build-Depends etc. case sensitivity.) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2002/02/09 Bug#133096: policy is unclear about Build-Depends etc. case sensitivity. Junichi Uekawa
• 2002/02/09 Bug#133030: debian-policy: debconf policy (specification) implies dpkg will run .config before preinst ALWAYS Henrique de Moraes Holschuh

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]