Fabrizio Polacco wrote:
> Right, and I agree.
> While we are discussing the rexpr to be used, I'd ask to please consider
> using:
> /close[s]? \s* = \s* (?:bug)? \s* \# (\d+)/ix
>
> Matches:
> close=#1234
> close =
> #97531
> Closes = Bug#5678 and also close=#8765
> CLOSE= BUG #9090
> but not:
> I can't close bug#8642
> close only part of #1480
> close=# 246
Hmm, this sounds as if you want to put the closes= stuff in the body of the
changelog, like:
pdmenu (1.2.25) unstable; urgency=low
* Fixed permissions problem. close=#1234 closes=#1235
-- Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri, 17 Oct 1997 16:12:36 -0400
Hmm, but my proposal was to put the closes= on the first line, like:
pdmenu (1.2.25) unstable; urgency=low closes=1234,1235
* Fixed permissions problem.
-- Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri, 17 Oct 1997 16:12:36 -0400
So why the need for a complicated regexp that matches lots of variation?
--
see shy jo
