I would suggest making debian 2.0 partially FHS compatible by inserting some symlinks. The real directories will still be FSSTND but symlinks will be available to make FHS directories valid to use for packages.
i.e. add symlinks: /usr/share/doc -> ../doc /usr/share/man -> ../man ... With these symlinks the migration to FHS is easier after hamm is stable and packages in hamm might already use FHS (or a subset thereof). After hamm is released the situation is reversed. The real directory for docs will be /usr/share/doc but there will be FSSTND compat symlinks: /usr/doc -> ../share/doc /usr/man -> ../share/man ... so that old packages can still be installed. On Mon, 3 Nov 1997, Christian Schwarz wrote: > On Mon, 3 Nov 1997, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > > What are talking about here is basically no problem to fix with a few > > symlinks in the base-files package. This is trivial and belongs into > > Debian 2.0. > > I'm sorry but I disagree :-) When I'm thinking about such symlinks I'm > reminded on the time when I used Slackware. yuck! No, I don't want to have > this again... > > However, if you feel we should discuss this then please forward this to > debian-policy.
