On Wed, 5 Nov 1997, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Tue, Nov 04, 1997 at 09:03:14PM +0100, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > > what about this : > > the new to-be 2.1 distribution should be empty (not all these symlinkls > > to the old hamm tree), and only real new packages with fhs should go > > there. > > I just joined this list; can somebody point me at > (a) a copy of the new FHS (which is a replacement for the FSSTND?), and > (b) a rationale for its changes. > > For example, from what I've picked up so far, usr/doc is changing > to usr/share/doc. That doesn't sound a particularly worthwhile > change to me at present, so I would like to read a rationale for the changes.
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/ -- Scott K. Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.gate.net/~storm/