I see that lintian lists the "comerr2g" package as having no copyright file.
There is one. However, I placed it in the /usr/doc/comerr2 directory, as it seemed to me more "friendly" than having this evil "g" in the dir name. I understand that the policy states "Text documentation should be installed in a directory /usr/doc/<package>, where <package> is the name of the package". My question is: does anybody think it would be a good idea to somewhat relax the policy in this respect, by allowing a lib-package with a "g" in its name to have a docdir without this "g" ? But it will cause a problem when there are libc5-compat packages that do not depend on their libc6 counterpart [I think it is allowed ?]. -- Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Stop making M$-Bill richer & richer, alt-email: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | support Debian GNU/Linux: debian-email: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | more powerful, more stable ! http://www.a2points.com/homepage/3475232 | Check <http://www.debian.org/>
