> Personally, I don't think that this is necessary, since I feel that > developers who care about policy should read the group, and those who > don't should be content to 'toe the line'. However, if someone else were > to propose a scheme like that above, I wouldn't vote against it. With the amount of traffic in almost all debian lists, I can hardly keep up with all of it. I do want to know the issues discussed but get burried in lots of email. Now having that list would allow me to decide how relevant the discussion is going to be for any of my packages. Things decided here are to be implemented by developers and sometimes they have a good reason to object even if they don't normally follow all/any discussions in this list.
Luis. -- Luis Francisco Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP Fingerprint = F8 B1 13 DE 22 22 94 A1 14 BE 95 8E 49 39 78 76
