Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Are we sure that a flat directory structure is good enough? I > have tons and tones of icons gathered over the years, and I have to > use the following directory structures. I find dividing the top level > into types - background, 16x16, 32x32, arrows, lines, dots, and > alphabetical subdirs is what works for me. > > I do have a lot of images ;-). However, in the long run, so > may Debian. We should not put ourselves into a straight jacket here > by not being proactive about structure.
Actually, I find that the most productive distinction is in bit-depth of the images. Fer instance, I have only 8-bit color for X. So I don't want flashy, color-consuming icons. I want simple, hopefully shared colormap icons. But some have 24-bit color and want their desktop to look like a videogame, so they want tons of colors. It would be fabulous if windowmanagers had a little toggle for the hi-color and low-color icon directories. .....A. P. [EMAIL PROTECTED]<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
