On 5 Aug 1999, Chris Waters wrote: > Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > (I think the issue was with the /usr/doc->/usr/share/doc move, not > > with FHS compliance. > > Yes, I'm trying to see the big picture, though. Why are we moving to > /usr/share/doc? FHS. Well, then, what about the FHS, are we close? > No. So the only thing that makes /usr/share/doc stand out is that > it's more visible than other FHS issues. It's not more important, nor > more difficult, except insofar as it affects every package. In > package-by-package terms, it's probably one of the *easiest* changes > required by the FHS. (No patching of binaries required.) > > So, *why* are we in such a *panic* about /usr/share/doc now? (This is > a rhetorical question, in case it's not obvious.) :-)
I ask myself the same question, but maybe not in rethorical sense. -- "b7f8114714f5bae8cd78471dc2e3ec1d" (a truly random sig)
