Seconded.

 Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> --- policy.sgml.orig  Wed Dec 29 17:01:51 1999
> +++ policy.sgml       Thu Dec 30 12:39:50 1999
> @@ -3140,6 +3140,27 @@
>         without) of your package.</p>
>         
>       <p>
> +       <em>Packages that provide window managers</em> should declare in
> +       their contol data that they provide the virtual package
> +       <tt>x-window-manager</tt>.  They should also register themselves as an
> +       alternative for <tt>/usr/bin/x-window-manager</tt>, with a priority
> +       calculated as follows:
> +       <list>
> +         <item>Start with a priority of 20.</item>
> +         <item>If the window manager supports the Debian menu system,
> +         add 20 points if this support is available in the package's
> +         default configuration (i.e., no configuration files belonging
> +         to the system or user have to be edited to activate the
> +         feature); if configuration files must be modified, add only 10
> +         points.</item>
> +         <item>If the window manager permits the X session to be
> +         restarted using a <em>different</em> window manager (without
> +         killing the X server) in its default configuration, add 10 points; 
> +         otherwise add none.</item>
> +       </list>
> +     </p>
> +     <p>
>         <em>Application defaults</em> files have to be installed in
>         the directory <tt>/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/app-defaults/</tt>.
>         They are considered as part of the program code.  Thus, they

Reply via email to