Hello. Arthur Korn schrieb: > Manoj Srivastava schrieb: > > Arthur> There should probably also be guidlines on syslog-facility > > Arthur> and the rotating and logging behavior of packages providing > > Arthur> syslogd, in order for other packages to know what they can > > Arthur> assume. > > > > Can you elucidate? The best way to determine what policy > > should say would perhaps be for the maintainers of the three logging > > daemon packages to reach an agreement based on current practice. If > > you could come up with a draft proposal, it would help a lot. > > It's already rolling ... > > -------- > |Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 22:44:41 +0200 > |To: Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, SZALAY Attila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > |From: Arthur Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > |Subject: proposed virtual packages: system-log-daemon and kernel-log-daemon [...] > -------- > > No reply until now. I'll wait another two weeks (I am away from > July 17. to July 22.), then I'll file wishlist-bugs against > syslog-ng and sysklogd.
I filed bugs (Bug#67603, Bug#67604) against sysklogd and syslog-ng but didn't get any response from the maintainers. What can I do more to get the attention of these maintainers? They are not marked 'away' in the developers-database. ciao, 2ri -- Use the source...
