Your message dated Wed, 2 Aug 2000 15:17:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closed in debian-policy 3.2.0.0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jun 1999 18:27:23 +0000
Received: (qmail 22826 invoked from network); 12 Jun 1999 18:27:23 -0000
Received: from murphy.debian.org (209.41.108.199)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 12 Jun 1999 18:27:23 -0000
Received: (qmail 30325 invoked from network); 12 Jun 1999 18:27:19 -0000
Received: from linux00.i21.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  by murphy.debian.org with SMTP; 12 Jun 1999 18:27:19 -0000
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by linux00.i21.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian/GNU) id OAA03691
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 12 Jun 1999 14:24:13 -0400
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 1999 14:24:13 -0400
From: Chris Fearnley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: debian-policy has an unclear statement on dependancies and priorities
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3i
Organization: Center for Syntropic Operations
X-Debian-CC: Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Package:  debian-policy
Version:  2.5.0.0

In /usr/doc/debian-policy/policy.html/ch2.html it says:
   Packages may not depend on packages with lower priority values. If this
   should happen, one of the priority values will have to be adapted.

I think this is unclear.  Especially the second sentence.  Perhaps this
phraseology would be clearer:

  All dependencies in a package MUST have equal or higher priority than
  the package itself.  In order to achieve this the priorities of one
  or more packages may have to be adjusted.

Lintian Maintainer:
BTW, do we have software that checks the archive for compliance with this
part of policy?  Does lintian do it?  A brief scan at that package suggests
that this should be added to lintian's wish list.

-- 
Christopher J. Fearnley          |  Linux/Internet/Web Consulting
[EMAIL PROTECTED]             |  Design Science Revolutionary
http://www.CJFearnley.com        |  Explorer in Universe
                    "Dare to be Naïve" -- Bucky Fuller
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 39398-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Aug 2000 22:17:23 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 02 17:17:22 2000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.interchange.ubc.ca [137.82.27.15] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian))
        id 13K6pG-0004dX-00; Wed, 02 Aug 2000 17:17:22 -0500
Received: from srtp05-245.resnet.ubc.ca ([142.103.56.245] helo=polya)
        by mail.interchange.ubc.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1)
        id 13K6pH-0003m6-00; Wed, 02 Aug 2000 15:17:23 -0700
Received: from jdg by polya with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
        id 13K6pA-0007wU-00; Wed, 02 Aug 2000 15:17:16 -0700
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 15:17:16 -0700
From: Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Closed in debian-policy 3.2.0.0
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

These bugs have been closed in policy version 3.2.0.0.

Thanks Manoj!

   Julian

-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

  Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of London. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        Debian GNU/Linux Developer,  see http://www.debian.org/~jdg
  Donate free food to the world's hungry: see http://www.thehungersite.com/

Reply via email to