Steve Greenland wrote: > On 21-Aug-00, 15:56 (CDT), Nicol?s Lichtmaier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Besides, it would be nice to have many rfc packages: doc-rfc-mail, > > doc-rfc-web, all of them puting packages in /usr/share/doc/rfc. And > > there could be symlinkf pointing to the most recent versions of > > standards: /usr/share/doc/rfc/HTTP would point to rfc2616.txt. > > This is a good argument. I think combined with Colin's idea that it be > called /usr/share/doc/RFC (embracing and extending the HOWTO example) I > could be in favor of it, as it avoids the package namespace.
I agree. This is good.
