Your message dated 02 Apr 2001 08:52:25 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [PROPOSAL] renaming of debian/rules file
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Apr 2001 12:59:31 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 01 07:59:31 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (mail.cps.matrix.com.br) [200.196.9.5]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14jhS7-0004KK-00; Sun, 01 Apr 2001 07:59:31 -0500
Received: from godzillah.rivendell.sol (srv1.rcm.org.br [200.196.10.141])
by mail.cps.matrix.com.br (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f31DDY625649;
Sun, 1 Apr 2001 10:13:35 -0300 (BRT)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: by godzillah.rivendell.sol (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 5D4A9585B; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 09:59:14 -0300 (BRT)
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 09:59:14 -0300
From: Henrique M Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [PROPOSAL] renaming of debian/rules file
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.14
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.5.2.0
Severity: wishlist
It is about time we recognize the truth. We have been constantly called as
the most elitist of the GNU/Linux distribuitons, and this is true.
So, I propose we make clear that we are indeed '1337 and rename the
debian/rules file to debian/rulez. Anyone who cannot see the benefits of
the added c00lness effect such a change would bring is not fit to be One Of
Us[TM].
The transition from the old to the new system can be easily performed by
including a test in dpkg-source, so that a debian/rules -> debian/rulez
symlink is added to the source deb if the debian/rules file is not present
and the debian/rulez file is. It should also automatically call the
atention of any lamerz that try to build a package without renaming the
rules file to rulez.
I also propose we add the following target to the standard debian/rulez
target list:
m00: should display an ASCII-art of a stoned cow, in deference of the s1kr3t
bovine powers behind the Debian packaging system, and the magic smoke of
Holy Cow that is portrayed in our logo.
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux godzillah.rivendell.sol 2.2.19 #1 Thu Mar 29 19:31:38 BRT 2001
i586
Versions of packages debian-policy depends on:
ii fileutils 4.0.43-1 GNU file management utilities.
PS: If you took this email seriously, hit your head with a hammer and think
again. It was sent in the April fools day, after all. If you second this,
you're seriously deranged, and in severe need of either more coffee, or sleep.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
Henrique Holschuh
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 92423-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Apr 2001 14:01:00 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 02 09:01:00 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (glaurung.green-gryphon.com) [63.161.160.94] (srivasta)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14k4tA-0005CL-00; Mon, 02 Apr 2001 09:01:00 -0500
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by glaurung.green-gryphon.com (8.12.0.Beta5/8.12.0.Beta5/Debian
8.12.0-1) id f32DqQid031858;
Mon, 2 Apr 2001 08:52:26 -0500
X-Mailer: emacs 21.0.100.1 (via feedmail 9-beta-7 I)
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PROPOSAL] renaming of debian/rules file
From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-URL: http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/
Organization: The Debian Project
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-Time: Mon Apr 2 08:52:25 2001
X-Face: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/;Y^gTjR\T^"B'fbeuVGiyKrvbfKJl!^e|e:iu(kJ6c|QYB57LP*|t
&YlP~HF/=h:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:6Cj0kd#4]>*D,|0djf'CVlXkI,>aV4\}?d_KEqsN{Nnt7
78"OsbQ["56/!nisvyB/uA5Q.{)gm6?q.j71ww.>b9b]-sG8zNt%KkIa>xWg&1VcjZk[hBQ>]j~`Wq
Xl,y1a!(>6`UM{~'X[Y_,Bv+}=L\SS*mA8=s;!=O`ja|@PEzb&i0}Qp,`Z\:6:OmRi*
Date: 02 Apr 2001 08:52:25 -0500
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 7
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090001 (Oort Gnus v0.01) Emacs/21.0.100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Having children is like having a bowling alley installed in your
brain. Martin Mull
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
