Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2001 09:25:19 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line debian-policy_3.5.4.0_i386.changes INSTALLED
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jul 1999 06:31:18 +0000
Received: (qmail 8359 invoked from network); 28 Jul 1999 06:31:17 -0000
Received: from ppp-121.mod.cableone.net (HELO icarus2.soark.net) ([EMAIL 
PROTECTED])
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 28 Jul 1999 06:31:17 -0000
Received: from knghtbrd by icarus2.soark.net with local (Exim 3.02 #1 (Debian))
        id 119NFB-0006Zf-00; Tue, 27 Jul 1999 23:31:13 -0700
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 23:31:13 -0700
From: Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PROPOSAL] /var/mail and /var/spool/mail
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.6i
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; from Manoj Srivastava on Tue, Jul 27, 1999 at 
02:39:36PM -0500
X-Operating-System: Linux icarus2 2.2.10-ac11
X-No-Junk-Mail: I do not want to get *any* junk mail.

Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.0.1

On Tue, Jul 27, 1999 at 02:39:36PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>  >> This way, people would be free to move /var/spool/mail/* to /var/mail/*
>  >> at their discretion, but this is never done automatically by the system.
> 
>  Joseph> That was the point of the suggestion.  There was actually a
>  Joseph> bug to this effect against policy suggesting we do this, but
>  Joseph> I closed it when it seemed FHS was going to lose /var/mail
>  Joseph> since there were complaints about it.
> 
>         Sounds like a plan. Could you reopen this proposal, then, and
>  we can make this a part of policy 3.0.X?

Okay,

I propose that we create a safe migration path between /var/spool/mail and
/var/mail.

The base-files package should implement the following:
  * If /var/mail does not exist but /var/spool/mail does (standard
    configuration today), a symlink /var/mail -> /var/spool/mail should be
    created.
  * If /var/mail does exist but /var/spool/mail does not, a symlink
    /var/spool/mail -> /var/mail should be created.
  * If /var/mail and /var/spool/mail are both directories, Something Is
    Really Screwed and the installation should fail, telling the user to
    clean up the disaster.  =>  (lost or mangled mail is potentially a
    disaster and we should not risk an automated solution..)

To do this I suggest we ammend policy first by replacing all existing
instances of /var/spool/mail with /var/mail and then changing the second
paragraph of section 5.6 which currently reads

   The mail spool is /var/spool/mail and the interface to send a mail
   message is /usr/sbin/sendmail (as per the FHS). The mail spool is part
   of the base system and not part of the MTA package.

to the following:

   The mail spool is /var/mail and the interface to send a mail message is
   /usr/sbin/sendmail (as per the FHS).  The mail spool is part of the
   base system and any package requiring use øf /var/mail must declare
   dependency on base-files (>= #BASEFILESVER#).


Also, a new section should be inserted after section 3.1.2 containing the
following:

  3.1.3 The system mail spool

   While the FHS mandates the mail spool be accessable as /var/mail, it is
   important to retain compatibility with older packages and locally
   compiled programs.  Packages using the mail spool should use /var/mail
   and declare dependency on base-files (>= #BASEFILESVER#).


There's some redundancy in that, but I think it's warranted I think.  If
someone else thinks they can do a better job with the changes to the
policy, feel free to offer.  =>

I think it's best to leave the nitty-gritty handling of making sure both
exist and one is a symlink to the other to the base-files maintainer since
that's all under the scope of the base-files post or preinst and doesn't
concern anything else.

-- 
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>             Debian GNU/Linux developer
GnuPG: 2048g/3F9C2A43 - 20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC  44F9 8FF7 D7A3 DCF9 DAB3
PGP 2.6: 2048R/50BDA0ED - E8 D6 84 81 E3 A8 BB 77  8E E2 29 96 C9 44 5F BE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Software is like sex, it's better when it's free.     -- Linus Torvalds

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 42052-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Apr 2001 08:25:37 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 30 03:25:37 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mserv1a.vianw.co.uk [195.102.240.34] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 14u8zx-0003ST-00; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 03:25:37 -0500
Received: from [195.102.196.122] (helo=polya)
        by mserv1a.vianw.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #5)
        id 14u8zt-0006ju-00; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 09:25:34 +0100
Received: from jdg by polya with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
        id 14u8zh-000635-00; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 09:25:21 +0100
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 09:25:19 +0100
From: Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: debian-policy_3.5.4.0_i386.changes INSTALLED
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.17i
Sender: Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Installing:
debian-policy_3.5.4.0.tar.gz
  to pool/main/d/debian-policy/debian-policy_3.5.4.0.tar.gz
fhs.txt byhand
fhs-2.1.html.tar.gz byhand
policy.txt.gz byhand
perl-policy.txt.gz byhand
debian-policy_3.5.4.0.dsc
  to pool/main/d/debian-policy/debian-policy_3.5.4.0.dsc
menu-policy.txt.gz byhand
mime-policy.txt.gz byhand
virtual-package-names-list.txt byhand
policy.pdf.gz byhand
debconf_specification.txt.gz byhand
policy.html.tar.gz byhand
libc6-migration.txt byhand
debian-policy_3.5.4.0_all.deb
  to pool/main/d/debian-policy/debian-policy_3.5.4.0_all.deb
policy.ps.gz byhand
Changes: debian-policy (3.5.4.0) unstable; urgency=low
 .
  * [ACCEPTED 2/4/01] /var/mail and /var/spool/mail  closes: Bug#42052
  * [AMENDMENT 26/04/2001] include Perl Policy       closes: Bug#83977
  * Also incorporates all the improvements that Julian has made to to the
    grammar and flow of the policy manual. The following are mostly
    Julian's fixes:
  * Fixed the confusing self referential language.   closes: Bug#85503
  * Correct ambiguous kanguage about declaring build dependencies.
                                                     closes: Bug#86436
  * Improved the woding of the footnote about shlibdeps.

   Julian

-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

         Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, Queen Mary, Univ. of London
       Debian GNU/Linux Developer,  see http://people.debian.org/~jdg
  Donate free food to the world's hungry: see http://www.thehungersite.com/

Reply via email to