On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 02:22:54AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> --- policy.sgml       Sun Mar 25 01:34:33 2001
> +++ policy.sgml.x-terminal-emulator   Sun Mar 25 02:17:56 2001
> @@ -5976,13 +5976,31 @@
>  
>       <p>
>         <em>Packages that provide a terminal emulator</em> for the X
> -       Window System which support a terminal type with a terminfo
> -       description provided in the <tt>ncurses-base</tt> package
> -       should declare in their control data that they provide the
> -       virtual package <tt>x-terminal-emulator</tt>.  They should
> -       also register themselves as an alternative for
> -       <tt>/usr/bin/x-terminal-emulator</tt>, with a priority of
> -       20.
> +       Window System which meet the criteria listed below should declare
> +       in their control data that they provide the virtual package
> +       <tt>x-terminal-emulator</tt>.  They should also register
> +       themselves as an alternative for
> +       <tt>/usr/bin/x-terminal-emulator</tt>, with a priority of 20.
> +     </p>
> +
> +     <p>To be an <tt>x-terminal-emulator</tt>, a program must:
> +     <list>
> +       <item>Be able to emulate a DEC VT100 terminal, or a compatible
> +             terminal.<item>
> +       <item>Support the command-line option "<tt>-e</tt>
> +             <emph>command</emph>", which creates a new terminal window
> +             <footnote>
> +                     "New terminal window" does not necessarily mean a
> +                     new top-level X window directly parented by the
> +                     window manager; it could, if the terminal emulator
> +                     application were so coded, be a new "view" in a
> +                     multiple-document interface (MDI).
> +             </footnote>
> +             and runs the specified <emph>command</emph>.</item>
> +       <item>Support the command-line option "<tt>-T</tt>
> +             <emph>title</emph>", which creates a new terminal window
> +             with the window title <emph>title</emph>.</item>
> +     </list>
>       </p>
>  
>          <p>

This seems completely sensible, but hasn't attracted another second by
someone who actually knows stuff about X, so: seconded.

Cheers,
aj

-- 
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you
  do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.''
                      -- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net)

Attachment: pgpnTSJecQck7.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to