-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Julian Gilbey wrote: > On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 09:09:03AM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote: > > > > I should probably shut up about this, but something has always > > bugged me (which means I'm probably doing it wrong). > > > > Take for example /usr/share/doc/debhelper/examples/rules.multi, > > The targets are like so: > > > > binary-indep: build install > > > > binary-arch: build install > > > > Both `binary-indep` and `binary-arch` depend on the build > > target. Why would you want to do a build (which will have > > arch-specific components) for `binary-indep` ? > > Great question! Please check http://bugs.debian.org/72335 and > consider seconding it, so that we can at long last begin to resolve > this issue in a standard way. It proposes the (optional) introduction > of two new targets: build-arch and build-indep which do -- guess what? > And build will depend on both. (Of course, there may be packages for > which splitting the build is infeasible. But that's not a problem; > just do it all in build-arch and have build-indep depend on > build-arch.) > > Julian I have read the thread, and I second it as ammended. Peter -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3ia Charset: noconv Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.5, an Emacs/PGP interface iQCVAwUBOwvz5LwVH8jSqROhAQFEPAQApo5+ZLIc9x0pPTa0yrkGzrZa0Y5RxMbY RwSVXilQ7v9Rk2XWCKKYRHg76zzCVX4H6/fEgT8MHbf5J8zZoxSSwLRY49RjlE0c CeC8OE8WxQw7R5czeP5VdPZtY+gqsSVDxTnPHTv6o67z5OHLF2vXvRhnz3ToktdM X3bJF+0z+qo= =ZKIk -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----