On 02-Jun-01, 17:35 (CDT), Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 01:02:38PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > > That is not the intent of policy (I should know; I drafted that > > modification). The intent is that packages may, rarely, have > > architecture dependant example files. Such files cannot go in > > /usr/share, so policy now says put them in /usr/lib, with a symlink to > > the other location. > > Not quite ;-) > > The intent was that *template* files which are used by maintainer > scripts to initialise configuration files cannot live in > /usr/share/doc.
Configuration templates != examples. The former are covered by 11.7.3 (penultimate paragraph) , the latter by 13.7. Steve -- Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Please do not CC me on mail sent to this list; I subscribe to and read every list I post to.)
