On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 12:17:23AM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Previously Julian Gilbey wrote: > > This inconsistency has only been relevant since testing came into > > being. > > Which is months ago now and still nobody noticed, probably since > the priorities for testing were never documented.
And yet this is the second time that this discussion has come up; I don't remember which list it was on last time, but I remember the three of us participating. I don't particularly care what the resolution is, but it *is* now documented in a footnote in policy, and people have started to notice the problem. It would be very easy for you or Anthony to fix, and would be a nice thing to do. When you have, please let me know, and I will adjust the policy footnote accordingly. Julian -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, Queen Mary, Univ. of London Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see http://people.debian.org/~jdg Donate free food to the world's hungry: see http://www.thehungersite.com/