On 07-Jun-01, 09:58 (CDT), Radovan Garabik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > + <p> > + Original upstream documentation, if in encoding other than UTF-8 > + or the well-established encoding for the particular language, > + should be converted either to UTF-8 or to the well-established > + encoding. Choice between UTF-8 and other encoding is left to the > + maintainer discretion, however, one package should have all the > + documentation in one consistent encoding for one language.
One bug: "the maintainer discretion" should be "the maintainer's discretion". One suggestion: I think that last phrase might be better expressed as "...however, the documentation for any single package should use only one encoding." Steve -- Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Please do not CC me on mail sent to this list; I subscribe to and read every list I post to.)