Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This means that the current GCC 2.95.x package is not conforming to > the policy because it doesn't provide a shared version of libgcc.a,
It's fixed in GCC 3.0. > and neither is libc6 because some parts of it can only be linked > statically. Which ones? >> If the libraries that you're referring to aren't .a's then this section >> doesn't even apply. > Of course ,these languages use the standard object file formats. They > simply do not support shared libraries well (think of the fragile base > class problem, or the effect of certain forms of name mangeling). Well, perhaps your time would be better spent in addressing these issues. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
