Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 31-Aug-01, 16:22 (CDT), Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Let's consider the following proposal: > > > > The GPL file in base-files should better be renamed to "GPL-2" and > > GPL should be a symlink pointing to it. > > > > [ The proposal is independent of whatever step may come afterwards if/once > > it is implemented ]. > > > > I will gladly implement it if it gets the approval of the policy > > group, which, for this particular proposal, I understand it as three > > seconders (since I'm not proposing it myself) and no objections. > > I second this, although since it's not really a policy decision it > doesn't really need group approval.
Maybe this is too nitpicky, but I'd prefer we name it GPL_2 (and the LGPL variants LGPL_2 and LGPL_2.1), to be more consistent with the way we delimit version numbers in other places.