On Monday, December 10, 2001 9:46 AM, Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Of course. Thing is that that's an awful lot of hassle and rather >offputting so people still want that big stick that would save them >grinding through it for stuff that really ought to be obvious. Do you not agree that because of the reasons already identified, particularly: * debconf is still relatively young * lets put our energies where they will be most productive that we should put this item on a too-be-revisited-at-[Year][Month][Date] list, and let the issue sleep. Best regards, Lloyd __________________________________________________________ Get your FREE personalized e-mail at http://www.canada.com
