Your message dated Wed, 23 Jan 2002 03:00:36 +0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line close has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Oct 2000 21:14:35 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 24 16:14:35 2000 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from (dumblink.loony) [::ffff:203.93.165.233] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 13oBOx-0005AH-00; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 16:14:35 -0500 Received: from zw by dumblink.loony with local (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian)) id 13oBV8-0008Hi-00; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 05:20:54 +0800 From: zhaoway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: packaging-manual: a wrong example To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: bug 3.3.6 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 05:20:54 +0800 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: packaging-manual Version: 3.2.1.0 Severity: normal in chapter 1, there is an example as listed by: $ grep tar /usr/share/doc/packaging-manual/packaging.html/ch-binarypkg.html dpkg --fsys-tarfile <var>filename</var>.deb | tar xof usr/doc/<var>\*</var>copyright | less ^^^ which i think should be: dpkg --fsys-tarfile drscheme_103-7_i386.deb | tar Ox ./usr/share/doc/drscheme/copyright | less ^^^^ ?? or is that something related to different tar versions? Or that my package broken? :-) But may sounds unlikely. :-) -- System Information Debian Release: woody Kernel Version: Linux dumblink 2.4.0-test9 #1 Îå 10ÔÂ 13 06:35:41 CST 2000 i686 unknown Versions of the packages packaging-manual depends on: ii fileutils 4.0z-2 GNU file management utilities. --------------------------------------- Received: (at 75508-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jan 2002 18:52:17 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 22 12:52:17 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from (jlonline.com) [61.155.13.238] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16T61p-0007yr-00; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 12:52:17 -0600 Received: from debian.org([202.111.10.19]) by js.cn(AIMC 2.9.5.2) with SMTP id jm23c4df4d8; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 02:46:25 +0800 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 03:00:36 +0800 From: zhaoway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Organization: Debian GNU/Linux User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i586; en-US; rv:0.9.7) Gecko/20011229 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: close Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] since it's tagged wontfix. and i fogget all the gory details involve that erport. hereby close it.