Your message dated Wed, 23 Jan 2002 03:00:36 +0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line close
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Oct 2000 21:14:35 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 24 16:14:35 2000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (dumblink.loony) [::ffff:203.93.165.233] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 13oBOx-0005AH-00; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 16:14:35 -0500
Received: from zw by dumblink.loony with local (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian))
        id 13oBV8-0008Hi-00; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 05:20:54 +0800
From: zhaoway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: packaging-manual: a wrong example
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.6
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 05:20:54 +0800
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: packaging-manual
Version: 3.2.1.0
Severity: normal

in chapter 1, there is an example as listed by:
$ grep tar /usr/share/doc/packaging-manual/packaging.html/ch-binarypkg.html 

dpkg --fsys-tarfile <var>filename</var>.deb | tar xof 
usr/doc/<var>\*</var>copyright | less
                                                  ^^^
which i think should be:

dpkg --fsys-tarfile drscheme_103-7_i386.deb | tar Ox 
./usr/share/doc/drscheme/copyright | less
                                                  ^^^^
?? or is that something related to different tar versions? Or that my
package broken? :-) But may sounds unlikely. :-)

-- System Information
Debian Release: woody
Kernel Version: Linux dumblink 2.4.0-test9 #1 Îå 10ÔÂ 13 06:35:41 CST 2000 i686 
unknown

Versions of the packages packaging-manual depends on:
ii  fileutils      4.0z-2         GNU file management utilities.

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 75508-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jan 2002 18:52:17 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 22 12:52:17 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (jlonline.com) [61.155.13.238] 
        by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 16T61p-0007yr-00; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 12:52:17 -0600
Received: from debian.org([202.111.10.19]) by js.cn(AIMC 2.9.5.2)
        with SMTP id jm23c4df4d8; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 02:46:25 +0800
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 03:00:36 +0800
From: zhaoway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Debian GNU/Linux
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i586; en-US; rv:0.9.7) Gecko/20011229
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: close
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

since it's tagged wontfix. and i fogget all the gory details involve
that erport. hereby close it.

Reply via email to