On Tue, 21 May 2002, Adam Conrad wrote: [tpo wrote:] > > > > Since so many packages are linking against OpenSSL now, please include > > the OpenSSL license in common-licenses [1]). OpenSSL is currently > > ranking as 24th most depended on package (dependencies basically from > > woody): > > Err... But it's not a "common" license, since no package other than > OpenSSL uses it. (And no other package will EVER use it, given its very > specific wording.)
Errm. Aehm. You're right. I though that all the packages linking against openssl will either have to include the license file or refer to it, but they can also refer to /usr/share/doc/openssl/copyright for the entire license. I'm withdrawing my bugreport and proposal. Thanks for giving me a clue, Adam... *t ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Tomas Pospisek sourcepole - Linux & Open Source Solutions http://sourcepole.com Elestastrasse 18, 7310 Bad Ragaz, Switzerland Tel:+41 (81) 330 77 13, Fax:+41 (81) 330 77 12 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]