Your message dated Thu, 28 Nov 2002 12:35:55 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Withdrawing my proposal
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Nov 2002 15:30:08 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 09 09:30:08 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from hirsch.in-berlin.de [192.109.42.6]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18AXYl-000299-00; Sat, 09 Nov 2002 09:30:07 -0600
Received: from hirsch.in-berlin.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by hirsch.in-berlin.de (8.12.1/8.12.1/Debian -2) with ESMTP id
gA9FU212029379
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT)
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 9 Nov 2002 16:30:02 +0100
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by hirsch.in-berlin.de (8.12.1/8.12.1/Debian -2) with UUCP id
gA9FU1kp029368
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 9 Nov 2002 16:30:01 +0100
X-Envelope-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Envelope-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from srittau by jroger.in-berlin.de with local (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
id 18AXTp-0001eZ-00; Sat, 09 Nov 2002 16:25:01 +0100
Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2002 16:25:00 +0100
From: Sebastian Rittau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: debian-policy: Remove the requirement to install static libraries
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.99.50
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.2 required=5.0
tests=PATCH_UNIFIED_DIFF,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.5.7.0
Severity: wishlist
I suggest the following alteration to the policy:
--- policy.sgml.old 2002-11-09 14:48:01.000000000 +0100
+++ policy.sgml 2002-11-09 16:19:08.000000000 +0100
@@ -5592,12 +5592,12 @@
<sect>
<heading>Libraries</heading>
<p>
- In general, libraries must have a shared version in the
- library package and a static version in the development
- package. The shared version must be compiled with
- <tt>-fPIC</tt>, and the static version must not be. In
- other words, each source unit ( <tt>*.c</tt>, for example,
- for C files) will need to be compiled twice.
+ All libraries must have a shared version in the
+ <tt>lib*</tt> package and may have a static version in the
+ <tt>lib*-dev</tt> package. The shared version must be compiled
+ with <tt>-fPIC</tt>, and the static version must not be. If a
+ package has a shared and a static version, each <tt>*.c</tt>
+ file will need to be compiled twice.
</p>
<p>
In some cases, it is acceptable for a library to be
@@ -5625,13 +5625,6 @@
If a library is available only in static form, then it must follow
the conventions for a development package.
</p>
- <p>
- All libraries must have a shared version in the
- <tt>lib*</tt> package and a static version in the
- <tt>lib*-dev</tt> package. The shared version must be
- compiled with <tt>-fPIC</tt>, and the static version must
- not be. In other words, each <tt>*.c</tt> file will need to
- be compiled twice.</p>
<p>
You must specify the gcc option <tt>-D_REENTRANT</tt>
Rationale:
The removed paragraph was redundant with the first paragraph of the
section and was moved there.
The main aspect of this proposal is the removed requirement of
including static versions of each library in the corresponding -dev
package. Many modern libraries don't work well as a static library and
usage of static libraries should be deprecated except for a few
specific cases.
This policy change would allow maintainers to decide for themselves,
whether a static version of their library is useful, thereby decreasing
the size of many -dev packages and in turn decreasing download time and
archive size. In the rare cases, where a static library is needed and
the package maintainer doesn't provide it, the user can either request
the inclusion from the maintainer or compile the library his/herself.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux jroger 2.4.19 #1 Don Sep 19 22:32:19 CEST 2002 i686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Versions of packages debian-policy depends on:
ii coreutils [fileutils] 4.5.1-2 The GNU core utilities
ii fileutils 4.5.1-2 GNU file management utilities
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 168435-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Nov 2002 11:40:12 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 28 05:40:11 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from hirsch.in-berlin.de [192.109.42.6]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18HN1e-0008PV-00; Thu, 28 Nov 2002 05:40:10 -0600
Received: from hirsch.in-berlin.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by hirsch.in-berlin.de (8.12.1/8.12.1/Debian -2) with ESMTP id
gASBe25t029053
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT)
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 28 Nov 2002 12:40:02 +0100
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by hirsch.in-berlin.de (8.12.1/8.12.1/Debian -2) with UUCP id
gASBe18p029051
for bugs.debian.org!168435-close; Thu, 28 Nov 2002 12:40:01 +0100
X-Envelope-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Envelope-To: bugs.debian.org!168435-close
Received: from srittau by moby.jroger.in-berlin.de with local (Exim 3.36 #1
(Debian))
id 18HMxX-0000Hu-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 28 Nov 2002 12:35:55 +0100
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 12:35:55 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Withdrawing my proposal
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
From: Sebastian Rittau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.6 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Since there were no supporters but a few objections to this proposal,
I'm withdrawing it.
- Sebastian
