Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 01:38:46PM +0100, Jerome Marant wrote: >> Currently, some window managers like IceWM or Sawfish, provide an >> alternative to x-window-manager.1. It would be consistent to add this >> to the policy since window managers provide an alternative to >> x-window-manager as well. > > Since the policy already requires a manual page for any program, and > since "x-window-manager" is in the $PATH and is used as any other program, > it makes sense for it to have a manual page. > > On the other hand, we could do it smarter and write manual pages for our > common alternatives, so that when a user looks them up in the manual system > they see the whole story.
Well, if running x-window-manager runs a given window manager, then the x-window-manager manpage should point to the manpage of the window manager which is run through x-window-manager. Isn't it logical? -- Jérôme Marant http://marant.org
