On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 07:20:46PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote: > On Tue, 2003-07-08 at 18:30, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > As a corollary, I suppose you would want to outlaw aalib > > No, since there are lots of strings that aren't legal package > names that precede all legal package names in listings.
There are a lot of strings that aren't legal package names that follow all legal package names in listings. For example ~ is not a legal package name and sort after any valid name (Policy 2.3.1) with C locale. If you really want to draft a policy, mandate that run-parts files are named [0-9][0-9]$pkg or something similar. Cheers, -- Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Imagine a large red swirl here.
