On Tue, 01 Jan 2008, Russ Allbery wrote: > Here's a patch that I think resolves this and is more explicit about the > problems and the suggested solutions. > > Comments? Seconds?
Looks good except: > + This package might typically be named > + <package><var>libraryname</var>-runtime</package>; note the > + absence of the <var>soversion</var> in the package name. We have more lib.*-tools (22) than lib.*-runtime (15). I wonder if we shouldn't rather recommend *-tools... it's probably more explicit to the end user too. On the other hand, it might create undue expectations. That said: seconded whatever naming you choose. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Le best-seller français mis à jour pour Debian Etch : http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/
