On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Mon, Aug 10 2009, Don Armstrong wrote: > > On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > >> Why is it not trivial? > > > > Because it requires editing the rules file for each such package? > > (debhelper using packages all get tweaked in a single shot.) > > I suspect all cdbs using packages can be similarly tweaked
Uh... cdbs uses debhelper, so tweaking would be unecessary. > Also, It is indeed trivial to add that to non-helper-package using > packages, it just requires some editing (just like modufying helper > packages will need editing). Since it's trivial, I look forward to seeing patches from you to implement policy once we decide it on all of the non-debhelper using packages. [How many person-hours of labor are we talking about now?] Don Armstrong -- I now know how retro SCOs OSes are. Riotous, riotous stuff. How they had the ya-yas to declare Linux an infant OS in need of their IP is beyond me. Upcoming features? PAM. files larger than 2 gigs. NFS over TCP. The 80's called, they want their features back. -- Compactable Dave http://www3.sympatico.ca/dcarpeneto/sco.html http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
