On Fri, Aug 21 2009, Russ Allbery wrote:

> Steve Langasek <vor...@debian.org> writes:
>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 03:47:24PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
>>> It looks good to me as a first step.  Seconded, with the caveat that we
>>> probably don't want to release this with Policy until we've hammered
>>> out any specific restrictions on how those directories can be used
>>> first.
>
>> I think the only specific restriction needed is already spelled out -
>> that packages can only install to the triplet matching their own
>> architecture.  Are there other restrictions that you think are called
>> for?
>
> The current restriction is specific to libraries.  Don't we need to say
> that you can't put *any* files into any triplet directory that isn't for
> your package architecture?

        Hmm. My first read was that one could not put anything that was
 not a library in these directories, but perhaps it should be stated
 explicitly.

        manoj
-- 
It's like deja vu all over again. Yogi Berra
Manoj Srivastava <sriva...@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to