On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 01:55:09PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 12:49:23PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > Hmm. I think that developers who insist on packaging their software > natively are unlikely to be persuaded by anything I have to say, and I think > that there's no existing policy that prohibits developers from doing this. > That doesn't mean I agree that it's *acceptable*.
I am not sure I agree with the first part of this statement [1] Is there a way to tell dkpg-source that the content of the Debian patch should be the debian directory and the rest should go in the 'upstream tarball' ? The other issue is how to handle the upstream changelog ? Cheers, -- Bill. <ballo...@debian.org> Imagine a large red swirl here. [1] I maintain two native packages, but they were natives before I adopted them and therefore this is not entirely my choice. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
