Manoj Srivastava <sriva...@debian.org> writes: > @@ -2739,13 +2744,14 @@ Package: libc6 > In the main <file>debian/control</file> file in the source > package, this field may contain the special value > <tt>any</tt>, the special value <tt>all</tt>, or a list of > - architectures separated by spaces. If <tt>any</tt> or > - <tt>all</tt> appear, they must be the entire contents of the > - field. Most packages will use either <tt>any</tt> or > - <tt>all</tt>. Specifying a specific list of architectures is > - for the minority of cases where a program is not portable or > - is not useful on some architectures, and where possible the > - program should be made portable instead. > + specific and wildcard architectures separated by > + spaces. If the special value <tt>any</tt> appears, it must > + be the entire contents of the field. Most packages will > + use either <tt>any</tt> or <tt>all</tt>. Specifying a > + specific list of architectures is for the minority of > + cases where a program is not portable or is not useful on > + some architectures, and where possible the program should > + be made portable instead. > </p> > > <p>
This still removes the statement that if <tt>all</tt> is present, it must be the entire contents of the field, which I believe is still the case in this context. I'd like to keep that provision. Otherwise seconded. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
