On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 04:07:48PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Currently, Debian Policy makes a general statement that all Bourne shell > scripts should start with set -e and does not (so far as I can see) make > an exception for init scripts. I've seen several init scripts use set -e, > which is usually a bad idea. It assumes that the shell function libraries > used for status reporting are "set -e"-clean, which they may not be, and > it causes the init scripts to exit in non-obvious ways and produce lots of > debugging headache.
> I think there's already a consensus that set -e is the wrong approach for > init scripts and instead the exit status of key commands should be checked > instead. I think Policy should reflect that consensus somewhere in the > section on init scripts. I don't think that 'set -e' is wrong for init scripts, so much as the LSB init script interfaces' requirement of 'set +e' is an unfortunate design flaw. Still, as many init scripts are using /lib/lsb/init-functions nowadays, I think it's worth calling this out in Policy as an exception. We should explicitly qualify this in terms of /lib/lsb/init-functions being an *optional* library that init scripts *may* use. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
