On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 15:03:41 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:

> Based on that search, there are still only 20 binary packages in the
> archive covered by the Artistic 2.0 license.

Thanks for your research!
 
> Given that, this license really isn't common in Debian, and hence doesn't
> warrant inclusion in common-licenses.  

Agreed.

> Certainly if the license becomes more broadly used in the
> future, it can be proposed for inclusion again at that time.

Some clear criterion might be helpful (and save you some time in the
future :))

Cheers,
gregor 
-- 
 .''`.   http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG key IDs: 0x8649AA06, 0x00F3CFE4
 : :' :  Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'   Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-    NP: U2: With Or Without You

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to