Your message dated Sun, 11 Jul 2010 18:12:15 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line policy updated
has caused the Debian Bug report #447231,
regarding python-defaults: The de facto Python policy should be blessed
"official"
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
447231: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=447231
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: python-defaults
Severity: important
I am new contributer to the Python Modules Team and I wanted to
express that I find the presence of two policy manuals confusing.
I understand that this is the de facto policy:
http://people.debian.org/~srivasta/manoj-policy/
... but this is the official policy:
http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/python-policy/
To reduce confusion and move towards a single unified policy, what is
stopping us from moving srivasta's policy to the proper location and
blessing it "official" while, perhaps, archiving the old policy for
access to those explicitly looking for it?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.20.3-bytemark-uml-2
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
--
Noah Slater <http://bytesexual.org/>
"Creativity can be a social contribution, but only in so far as
society is free to use the results." - R. Stallman
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.5.4-4
policy was updated in 2.5.4-4
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
