On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Charles Plessy wrote: > Yes, I think that the release is important, and no, I do not think that we > should write vague encouragements the Developers reference. I think that it is > a place for precise informations, not for morale lessons.
I think that my patch contains precise information on what developers should do. Nowhere in your comments have you shown that my wording implies "morale lessons". > Most of the contents of Raphaël's patch is to speak in the name of the > Release, > Security and QA teams, I think that it would be much saner if these teams > would > propose some content themselves. And if they do not, isn't it a sign that it > is > not needed ? It's a sign that few people like to write documentation and the volunteers in those teams prefer to do invest their time in other ways. But I will mail the release team. > I do not who asked you to comment, but I think that it would be more > constructive > if that person took on his own time to improve Raphaël's patch. I asked him to comment because the DPL is the most representative person that I could think of. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Follow my Debian News ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.com (English) ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.fr (Français) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110311154722.gb27...@rivendell.home.ouaza.com
