On 08/05/12 at 20:11 -0400, Chris Knadle wrote:
> Package: developers-reference
> Version: 3.4.7
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
> 
> In a long email thread on [debian-devel] concerning a package which has a 
> maintainer that is temporarily MIA due to being time overloaded, the 
> discussion came to an idea for using NMUs in order to bring the package up to 
> date to upload a new upstream version of the software.  I was directed to 
> read 
> section 5.11 of the Developer's Reference, but it doesn't seem to clearly 
> state that this is allowed.  Stefano Zacchiroli responded with a post [1] 
> explaining NMUs from his point of view which I find is a bit more clear in 
> this area.
> 
> Attached is a minimal patch against commit:
> 
>    r9201 | taffit | 2012-04-25 09:25:10 -0400 (Wed, 25 Apr 2012)
> 
> in the repository for the Developer's Reference.  Diffstat:
> 
>  pkgs.dbk |   11 +++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> 
> [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/04/msg00486.html
> 
>   -- Chris
> 
> --
> Chris Knadle
> chris.kna...@coredump.us

> diff --git a/pkgs.dbk b/pkgs.dbk
> index af8bcf0..6959ac8 100644
> --- a/pkgs.dbk
> +++ b/pkgs.dbk
> @@ -1923,8 +1923,15 @@ Before doing an NMU, consider the following questions:
>  <itemizedlist>
>  <listitem>
>  <para>
> -Does your NMU really fix bugs? Fixing cosmetic issues or changing the
> -packaging style in NMUs is discouraged.
> +Will the NMU help the maintainer?

How do you determine that?

> +</para>
> +</listitem>
> +<listitem>
> +<para>
> +Does your NMU really fix bugs? ("Bugs" includes wishlist bugs for packaging
> +a new upstream version, but care should be taken to minimize the impact to
> +the maintianer.)

So other kind of wishlist bugs are not included?
typo: maintianer.

> +Fixing cosmetic issues or changing the packaging style
> +(dh, cdbs, etc) in NMUs is discouraged.

rewrite to:
   changing the packaging style (e.g. switching from cdbs to dh) is
   discouraged.
?

  Lucas



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120510142644.ga19...@xanadu.blop.info

Reply via email to