On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 05:00:27PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Colin Watson <[email protected]>, 2008-03-12, 10:00: > >I recently ran into this yet again, with a set of packages (scim > >et al) calling update-alternatives --remove in 'prerm upgrade', > >and thereby breaking user configuration on every upgrade. I do not > >think that the issue has got significantly better in the 7.5 years > >since I originally reported this bug. > > I didn't get better in 12 years either! > > I've just tested 665 packages that use update-alternatives. > 122 of them removed an alternative on upgrade.
Could you report bugs ? Maybe this test should be included in piuparts. Cheers, -- Bill. <[email protected]> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120920165011.GA30814@yellowpig
